HomePYQIndian PolityLandmark Judgments
Landmark Judgments
3 questions
All (3) Unattempted (3) Skipped (0) Correct (0) Wrong (0)
Q.1
WBCS Prelims 2019
Which section of the Indian Penal Code deals with adultery ?
A. 496
B. 497
C. 498
D. 499
Explanation
Why Correct: Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code defined adultery as a criminal offense until the Supreme Court struck it down as unconstitutional in 2018.
Distractor Analysis: Section 496 covers fraudulent marriage ceremonies. Section 498 addresses cruelty by a husband or his relatives toward a married woman. Section 499 defines defamation.
Takeaway: The Supreme Court's 2018 Joseph Shine v. Union of India judgment decriminalized adultery, declaring Section 497 unconstitutional for violating Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.
Answer or skip previous question to unlock.
Q.2
WBCS Prelims 2012
The verdict of the Supreme Court in which of the following cases has made the imposition of the President's rule in any state under article 356 of constitution difficult ?
A. A.K Gopalan vs. Union of India
B. S.R Bommai vs. Union of India (regarding the state of Karnataka)
C. Kaveri water dispute case between two Southern States
D. None of the above
Explanation
Why Correct: The Supreme Court's 1994 S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India judgment established strict guidelines for imposing President's Rule under Article 356, requiring the central government to prove a breakdown of constitutional machinery and making the imposition subject to judicial review.
Distractor Analysis: A.K. Gopalan vs. Union of India (1950) dealt with preventive detention laws under Article 21. The Kaveri water dispute case involves interstate water sharing between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu under Article 262, not Article 356.
Takeaway: The Bommai case also held that the President's satisfaction under Article 356 is not beyond judicial scrutiny, and the imposition can be struck down if found malafide or based on irrelevant grounds.
Answer or skip previous question to unlock.
Q.3
WBCS Prelims 2007
In which year the Supreme Court of India dismissed the petitions of the cement, fertilizer and sugar industries challenging the Jute Packaging Material Act, 1987?
A. 1980
B. 1990
C. 1993
D. 1996
Explanation
Why Correct: The Supreme Court upheld the Jute Packaging Material Act, 1987 in 1993, dismissing challenges from industries that argued it violated their freedom to choose packaging materials under Article 19(1)(g).
Distractor Analysis: 1980 predates the Act itself. 1990 saw economic liberalization policies but no Supreme Court judgment on this specific Act. 1996 witnessed the Supreme Court's Vishaka guidelines establishing sexual harassment prevention measures in workplaces.
Takeaway: The Jute Packaging Material Act mandates use of jute for packing certain commodities to protect the jute industry and promote eco-friendly packaging, supporting rural employment.
Sign in to save progress

Sign in to Papersetters

Save your progress, unlock Smart Review, and track your performance.

Study
PYQ PYQ Plus Practice Smart Review Highlights Mock Test